Talk:Graphics card compatibility

Table Layout

The list of cards is likely to be very large... I suggest we move to a table layout CodeAnxiety 18:36, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

I'd say just get rid of the working card category. The only interesting thing on here will be non/partially working cards. MasterSlowPoke 20:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

I can agree with that... the list would keep growing year after year anyways. I've went ahead and made that change. CodeAnxiety 20:55, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

I should have checked this page before doing my changes as I can agree with listing the not working GPUs. But that list can become equally long and it might be worth considering listing the GPU class only and link to WikiPedia for the list of actual GPUs. There's also a striking lack of integrated GPUs, especially from Intel, which are the more interesting ones to list... --boki 13:56, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps we can put the non-working and cards with issues above the working cards. This way those are more easily available to the user while still keeping a list of cards that are known to work. SimReality 14:31, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Working cards are very important for those people who want to buy a new card and need to know for sure which ones work.--Zman 03:53, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

I included an older card that I use and works fine. I thought it would be worthwhile to include cards like these for people buying used computers, parts, etc. Also as a side note, XNA works beautifully on a MAC (INTEL) running VMWare Fusion 2.0.1 in XP. I mention this for any MAC people wishing to try XNA! JSearle 22:16, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

The VMWare section should be updated as XNA does not work on VMWare4.6 with VS Ultimate and a GeForce 8600 stated as working and according the apphubs forum from windows, many report that it is simply not possible.